Day: January 17, 2015

Writing to Respond [3]

Recently an article was written by Samantha Taylor about teenagers using social media and texting to contact and connect with each other. The article portrays an teenagers using social media as being anti-social. I feel humiliated and very offended and I’m sure other teenagers that viewed your article would feel the same. The article will have an influence on how people look at teenagers.

Yes, there are some negative points about using social media that can be addressed in the article informing teenagers on how to stay safe whilst using it, however, at the same time there are a many positive points about using social media.

To begin with, Jonathan Franzen mentions that teenagers have become a generation that can’t relate face-to-face. With little evidence, Franzen is unable to accurately blame social media for this. As Franzen refers to us as a ‘Generation that can’t relate face-to-face’ he is giving others an impression that he finds teenagers a disgrace as we are changing the generation into an anti-social society. This is unacceptable language to use to describe teenagers. As technology improves giving us easier ways to communicate, we adapt to the technology that we are born into. As technology is forever improving so we will keep adapting to it. This article is quite bias as not every teenagers does and is what is mentioned in it. This gives Franzen no right to talk about the ‘future generation’ as all we are doing is adapting to new technology.

In fact, social media makes it easier for people to socialize with others, (i.e. friends and family) without having to be face to face with them. This is a good thing as they’re able to speak to other people without having to be in same place. Another reason why social media has made a beneficial impact on us, is that we are able to speak to new people that we may have not been able to talk to in person, and if all goes well, manage to meet them whilst following safety terms.

Additionally, the second point that I picked up from the article was when, Samantha mentions an interview on TV with American comedian Louis CK. He mentions that he wouldn’t give his daughters mobile phones for fear they wouldn’t develop empathy. But this is wrong. Very wrong. Social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, Youtube and Skype allows us to communicate through the internet. Youtube is a social network where people can post and watch videos then gather feedback from people from all around the world. This gives different emotions whether the feedback is good or not.  Skype is a good example of how empathy can be linked with social networks. As you are able to video call, this is equivalent to seeing someone face-to-face.

Facebook also can be used as a “noticeboard”. For school, teachers can create a group in Facebook and add the students into it and post a reminder  message for students in the group. With this, students will be reminded when is their upcoming test and study for it and will not miss on any important things because the teacher can pass the message through Facebook and even if the students were absent, he or she will get to know. A teacher could also share and recommend a hyper-link of a web page with the students that may help them to revise. So this isn’t just beneficial with socializing, it is also beneficial for education.

Furthermore, there are undoubtedly disadvantages too such as;  One of the most important of these is the intrusion into the lives of others. Some teenagers are obsessed with social networks.Teenagers who are obsessed to social networks often go online with their phone almost every hour to have their status updated. Some of them even do that during lesson and will affect their studies. But these problems can easily be resolved with help from their parents. For example, their parents taking control of how long they use their social networks.

There are advantages and disadvantages connected with social networks. With the help of parents guidance, social network will be better and safer for teenagers.

Aatif Muhammad

A student at London Nautical School

 

Writing to Argue – Coursework # 1

Think of a beautiful loving child all alone in a dark place, he/she is confused but has it’s mother to protect it from anything, and it doesn’t have a clue that something will kill it, and even if it did it does not have any way to stop this from happening.  Many pregnant females have made the decision to have an abortion. An abortion is to kill your baby before it leaves the womb, in other words; to have an operation to end pregnancy. There are many ways why people make this decision. Abortion is wrong, each time it is done an innocent life is being killed.It is exactly like killing a alive person however the only thing that differs is that the unborn child does not have a say on why they should stay alive, and that is why I am here to speak for them!

Between 1968 and 2003 almost 6 million legal abortions were performed in Britain. This is almost equal to the population of Greater London. Each year about 200,00 abortions take place per annum. (187,000 in England and Wales and 12,000 in Scotland). That amounts to about 550 abortions every day. This is 550 babies being killed per day, and only in the Uk alone. Abortion and murder are both the same thing. If a doctor was too kill a child one minute after it was born it would be murder, however if a doctor killed a child one minute before the child was born it would be the mothers choice as abortion. This should not be acceptable as abortion is taking away the life of an unborn child, which is just as equal as taking a life of a born child.

 

Life starts at conception when the sperm and the egg fuses, therefore abortion is wrong. Everyone would agree that killing mankind is wrong. Murder is unlawful killing of one human being by another. So why isn’t abortion illegal but murder is if they’re the same thing. Murder prevents the victim from living, whether they are born or in the womb. Abortion is murder, once the egg is fertilized it becomes a human being, therefore it is entitled to have all the rights that human beings are entitled to by law. So if abortion is murder then it should be illegal as it is breaking the law. killing a fetus or fertilized egg is equal as killing a baby that has been born.

 

Many individual catholics and christians believe that there is nothing wrong with abortion because it is not mention in the bible as a wrong thing to do, but of course it isn’t because at the time there was no such thing as abortion and neither could it take place. The bible may not mention anything about abortion but it does mention “Thou shalt not kill”, this shows us that killing in any form of way is forbidden and should not be done. It does not have to mention anything about abortion for us to know that it is wrong.

Abortion is wrong, it is murder, there are better alternatives rather than killing your unborn child. If abortion was to become illegal and you are unable to look after your baby or you were raped and you did not want any thing to do with the baby you could go to social workers, foster carers and adoption centres, to find someone who will look after your child safely and well rather than having it killed. You may be thinking that you would not want someone else that you have never met or you don’t know to look after your child. However wouldn’t it be much better to tell them when their older that you were unable to look after them properly so you gave them up for adoption or to care, rather than telling them that you were unable to take care of them so you were thinking about have an abortion to kill them. Think about how would they feel? They would have to live the rest of their life knowing that their parents were thinking about killing them.